This website uses only technical or equivalent cookies.
For more information click here.


Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by social communication impairments, and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB). Difficulties in Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in ASD as well as deficits in Executive Functions (EF) are reported in the literature. To date, few studies have investigated the influence of deficits in ToM and EF on ASD symptom severity, including RRB. Thus, the aim of this clinical study is to investigate the relationship between EF, ToM, and RRB in ASD. Our sample consisted of 50 ASD participants divided in two groups: 34 adolescents (mean age = 15.65; SD = 1.68) and 16 adults (mean age = 23.19; SD = 10.08). A mediation analysis evaluated whether the relationship between ToM and EF can be mediated by RRB for each group. Our results demonstrate that RRB plays a key role in the promote the correct relationship between ToM and EF. During development, the structuring of rehabilitation interventions focusing on these aspects can improve abilities to achieve important goals that promote independence and quality of life.


Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by social communication impairments, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors 1. According to the literature, more than half of individuals with ASD do not have intellectual disabilities 2,3 and, through appropriate resources and support, could access the same educational, employment, and social opportunities as their neurotypical peers 4,5. However, complete independence and integration into the community often remains a challenge for individuals with high functioning ASD, especially in the transition phase from adolescence to adulthood 6,7.

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the social-cognitive ability to understand and infer intentions, beliefs, thoughts, and feelings of others, and to predict their behaviour 8-14. Several studies indicate that individuals with ASD may have extensive impairment in executive functioning 15-21, especially planning, goal directed behavior, cognitive flexibility and problem solving.

The relationship between ToM and executive dysfunction is still debated, and several studies have attempted to identify the direction of the relationship between the two abilities. Some research suggested that the development of executive function enables the development of ToM 22-27, whereas other authors have argued that ToM abilities are necessary for development of executive control 28-34. Several longitudinal studies suggest that early ToM (or its precursors) can also predict later executive functions 35-38. Even if the nature of this relation is still unclear and ambiguous, the evidence currently available seems to indicate a bidirectional relationship between these processes, where some underlying mechanisms are shared 38.

“Non-social” features of autism include RRB, rigidity, and perseverance that, compared with “social” features, are less well understood and studied. Some studies hypothesize that RRB may be associated with impaired executive processes 20,39-42 but the causal relationship between these aspects is largely unknown 43. For example, it has been suggested that the tendency to persevere on tests involving executive functions may be influenced by circumscribed interests, motor movement patterns, or persistent repetition of activities (such as a rigid routine) or speech that are difficult to interrupt 44,45. Some evidence suggested that restricted and repetitive behavior are associated with aberrant temporal dynamics of cognitive control brain circuits 46. A meta-analysis confirmed the relation between executive functions and RRB, emphasising the importance of understanding these relationships for future purposes 43. RRB in ASD have been shown to be related to deficits in cognitive flexibility, which is the ability to adapt cognitive processing strategies according to environmental demands 17,26,47. Happé and Frith 18 suggested that executive functioning encompasses the processing of information in context for global meaning, i.e., central coherence. According to the weak central coherence hypothesis, people with ASD tend to be overly focused on details at the expense of understanding the overall meaning of the nature of a specific context 17,18,48. Fabio et al. 17 demonstrated that cognitive flexibility correlates with a specific social cognition skill, namely facial expression recognition, supporting the hypothesis of an executive deficit in ASD. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that investigating cognitive flexibility in the population with ASD has important clinical implications in terms of understanding RRB.

Limited research attempted to investigate the explanatory power that deficits in ToM and executive functions with respect to changes in ASD symptom severity, including repetitive and stereotyped behaviors 23,42,49.


Objective of the study

Based on these assumptions we designed and conducted a clinical study to investigate the relationship between planning (i.e., executive function), understanding of others’ intentions (i.e. ToM), and RRB in ASD. Indeed, understanding the relationship between these variables may provide important insights from a clinical and rehabilitation perspective.



Participants were considered eligible for the study according to the following criteria: a diagnosis of Level-1 ASD (high functioning autism) made by a qualified expert in according to the criteria reported by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition1 and confirmed using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - Second Edition 50 and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised 51; age 11 years and older; absence of other neurological disorders; and absence of pharmacological treatment. Participants were recruited by the Reference Regional Centre for Autism (CRRA) in L’Aquila, Italy. The total sample included 50 participants divided into adolescents (age range between 11 and 18 years old) and adults (more than 18 years old); thus, we obtained a group of 34 adolescents (28 males and 6 females; mean age = 15.65 years, SD = 1.68; mean education duration 9.8 years, SD = 1.77) and a group of 16 adults with ASD (14 males and 2 females; mean age = 23.19 years, SD = 10.08; mean education duration 13.9 years, SD = 1.53). Participants were tested individually in a quiet room. The experimental protocol was approved prior to the recruitment of participants by the Ethical Committee of the NHS Local Health Unit. Participants or tutor-by-law provided their informed consent to participate in the study after being properly briefed about the aims of the study and the confidentiality of data processing. The study followed the principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki.


Clinical measures

The Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised 51,52 is a semi-structured clinical interview conducted with a caregiver, based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) 53 and focused on ASD symptoms such as abnormal reciprocal interaction, abnormal communication, and restricted and repetitive behavior. This interview is composed of 93 ordinal-scaled items where only part of them is used in the algorithm for autism classification. ADI-R is composed of five sections regarding concerns, communication, social development and play, repetitive and restricted behaviors, and behavioral problems.

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 Edition 50 represents a semi-structured assessment of communication, social interaction, restricted and repetitive behaviors; the activities provided are directed at stimulating all those behaviors significant to the diagnosis of ASD. The ADOS-2 consists of 5 different modules, selected in relation to language skills and age. According to age and maturity level of participants, we used Module 3 or Module 4, both designed for verbally fluent individuals.

ToM measure

The Intentions Attribution - Comic Strip Test 54 (IAT) is a type of mentalizing nonverbal test. It consists of a series of cartoon-type stimuli to assess the ability to attribute and understand other’s intentions. Participants are shown a sequence of three vignettes in which there is a character performing an action and then they are asked to identify one of the three alternative proposed endings that represent the intention behind the action. This test aims to assess the ability of an individual to deduce the character’s intention. The test is divided into two conditions: 1. First Order Intention Attribution (14 items) and 2. Second Order Intention Attribution (12 items). There is a Control Condition (12 items) describing physical causality with human figures and objects. Each subject can get a score between 0 and 1 for each story. To our knowledge, to date, there are no standardized tests that allow assessment of nonverbal attribution of intentions.

Executive function measure

The Tower of London (ToL) was originally developed by Shallice 55. ToL is considered a measure of planning abilities and a poor performance during this task is interpreted as an inefficient performance in planning processes 55,56. The instrument is composed by a wooden board with three pegs of different length with three different coloured balls inserted on them. Starting from an initial disposition of the balls, participants are asked to move them to match a goal disposition. The average time to reach the goal disposition and number of moves are usually measures considered to assess the performance during the task. ToL is a tool that assesses higher order problem-solving abilities and can identify deficits in the planning processes involved in generating a plan to address new demands.

Statistical analysis

Regression analysis

We performed a linear regression analysis. Variables for regression analysis included measures of intention’s attribution (AIT), RRB (reported by ADOS-2 or ADI-R) and planning (ToL). Specifically, for the adolescent group we considered the total score of IAT, the total score of ToL and RRB derived from ADI-R. For the adult group, we considered the total score obtained on the second-order intention attribution items of the IAT because it requires more difficulty in the process of inferring character intention. This decision is supported by evidence that ToM continues to develop throughout childhood, adolescence, and adulthood 57-63. ToM ability improves with age 64 so items in the first-order series might be too simple and easily completed by an adult individual. Regarding planning skills, we divided the ToL test according to the number of moves required to move from start-to end-state and considered only the average of the scores obtained at the “difficult” trials, namely those requiring 5 moves. This approach is consistent with the hypothesis that increasing age would lead to better performance on the more difficult tests of the ToL. According to Albert and Steinberg 65, although mature performance on ToL was attained by age 17 on relatively easy problems, performance on the hardest problems showed improvements into the early 20s. Furthermore, as pointed out by Hill 19, planning difficulties in individuals with autism are evident at the most complex levels 66, which would correspond to the planning required in everyday life. Finally, we decided to consider RRB derived from the ADOS-2 Module 4 because the ADI-R may not be reliable in adults without intellectual disability 67. In addition, parents of younger individuals with ASD may be more sensitive to the reporting of RRB, whereas parents of older individuals may be habituated to these behaviors and thus less likely to report them. In addition, it is highly likely that the frequency and characteristics of RRB change with age 68-72.

Mediation analysis

Mediation analysis allows to understand the mechanism through which the causal variable effects the outcome 11,73,74. In mediation process the association between the independent variable X and the dependent variable Y involve one (or more) mediator variable (M) that is able to explain the relation cause-effect between X and Y 75. In order to explore the significance of mediation effect we used the Sobel test 76,77. Specifically, the Sobel test was performed to evaluate whether the constructs measured by ToL and IAT were mediated by RRB, as one of characteristic symptoms of ASD in both adolescent and adult groups. The Sobel test involves computing the ratio of ab to its estimated standard error 11. The results were considered significant at a threshold of p < 0.05. The analysis was performed using The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.


Two regression analyses were conducted for each age group separately: one with executive function as the dependent variable and intention’s attribution as the independent variable, and another one with executive function as the dependent variable and RRB as the independent variable. Based on the results, a mediation analysis was run with intention’s attribution as the independent variable, executive function as the dependent variable and RRB as the mediator.

Adolescent group

We conducted a first regression analysis using the planning ability as the dependent variable and the intention’s attribution as the independent variable (R2 = 0.41, b = 0.17, SE = 0.05, p = 0.002). This was followed by a second regression analysis where RRB, measured by ADI-R, became the predictor, while ToL was the dependent variable (R2 = 0.32, b = -0.32, SE = 0.12, p = 0.02). We run a mediation model based on regression results (Tab. I). The relationship between Intention Attribution (X) and planning (Y), using the ADI-R RRB items as mediator, was explored. The Sobel test showed that this model was significant (SE = 0.02; p = 0.03).

Adult group

We conducted a first regression analysis using the planning ability as the dependent variable and the intention’s attribution as the independent variable (R2 = 0.32, b = 0.49, SE = 0.19, p = 0.02). This was followed by a second regression analysis where RRB, measured by ADOS-2, module 4 became the predictor, while planning was the dependent variable (R2 = 0.47, b = -1.10, SE = 0.36, p = 0.01). We run a mediation model on the basis of the regression results. The relationship between Intention Attribution (X) and planning (Y), using the ADOS-2 RRB items as mediator, was explored. The Sobel test showed that this model was significant (SE = 0.27; p = 0.04).


The present study examined the role of the RRB on two skills, namely planning as ability of executive functioning and intention’s attribution as a ToM ability, in a sample of adolescents and adults with high functioning ASD. Mediation analysis results showed that in both groups the ability to understand and attribute others’ intentions (independent variable) and the planning ability (dependent variable) were mediated by a symptomatic characteristic, the RRB (M). Specifically, the observed effects suggest that RRB negatively influences the relationships between intention’s attribution and planning ability.

Our models support the hypothesis that the ability to represent one’s own mental states and those of others is necessary to “strategically” control thoughts and behaviors 78-80. The ability to infer the intentions of others is achieved very early in development 10,81,82, whereas proper maturation of executive functions appears to occur during adolescence 83. Similarly, RRB emerge early in ASD 84-86. As explained by Wade and collaborators 38, tasks that require the ability to plan and inhibitory control need the awareness that actions to achieve the goal are first mentally represented. Thus, the ability to exercise the executive control depends on the ability to understand that mental states are causally related to actions and behaviors. Our results showed that in individuals with ASD this relationship could be disrupted by the presence of RRB. Indeed, better understanding of others’ intentions and fewer RRB should indicate better planning skills. Identifying the relationship between the characteristics of ASD that represent a barrier to develop abilities is critical to structuring, as early as childhood, interventions to improve impaired skills and support the individual toward achieving developmental milestones, thereby improving quality of life 87,88. It would be useful to structure interventions to improve ToM and social skills, as well as offset the impact of RRB on daily functioning, to promote executive skills that develop later.

Despite the interesting results, our study has limitations. A potential limitation concerns the sample size, a critical methodological item concerning the distribution of the product term; however, our sample size ensures the conditions for analysis.

Future studies should test the mediation model considering gender as a possible interaction variable. In addition, future studies should consider a neurotypical developmental control group. Executive functions is an umbrella-term that comprehends a series of processes 89 but in our study we considered only planning skill.

In conclusion, our results indicate that RRB plays a key role in promoting the correct relationship between ToM and planning. Working on these aspects during the development of ASD children and adolescents appears a logic strategy to improve abilities and achieve important goals toward independence and quality of life.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest


This study was funded by “DISCAB GRANT 2022” awarded by the Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy.

Authors’ contributions

MV and MM, designed the research and the data analysis; MA analysed data; ILD and AB collected the data; all the authors contributed in writing the paper.

Ethical consideration

The experimental protocol was approved prior to the recruitment of participants by the Ethical Committee of the National Health System Local Health Unit (Comitato Etico delle Province di L’Aquila e Teramo, approval reference number 0052505/21).

Figures and tables

Group Model Variables b (SE) P
Adolescents 1 Planning abilities (DV) 0.17 (0.05) 0.002
Intention attribution (IV)
2 Planning abilities (DV) -0.32 (0.12) 0.02
Restricted and repetitive behaviors (IV)
Adults 1 Planning Abilities (DV) 0.49 (0.19) 0.02
Intention Attribution (IV)
2 Planning abilities (DV) -1.10 (0.36) 0.01
Restricted and repetitive behaviors (IV)
TABLE I. Results of regressions analysis.


  1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
  2. Kogan M, Blumberg S, Schieve L. Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1395-1403. doi:
  3. Reimer B, Fried R, Mehler B. Brief report: examining driving behavior in young adults with high functioning autism spectrum disorders: a pilot study using a driving simulation paradigm. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43:2211-2217. doi:
  4. Hendricks D, Wehman P. Transition from school to adulthood for youth with autism spectrum disorders: Review and recommendations. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2009;24. doi:
  5. Virués-Ortega J. Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose-response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:387-399. doi:
  6. Reyes C, Perzynski A, Kralovic S. Factors Associated with Transition Planning in Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil. Published online 2021:1-14. doi:
  7. van Schalkwyk G, Volkmar F. Autism Spectrum Disorders: Challenges and Opportunities for Transition to Adulthood. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017;26:329-339. doi:
  8. Attanasio M, Masedu F, Quattrini F. Are Autism Spectrum Disorder and Asexuality Connected?. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51:2091-2115. doi:
  9. Blakemore S, Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:561-567. doi:
  10. Happé F, Frith U. Annual research review: Towards a developmental neuroscience of atypical social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55:553-557. doi:
  11. Mazza M, Mariano M, Peretti S. The Role of Theory of Mind on Social Information Processing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Mediation Analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:1369-1379. doi:
  12. Mazza M, Pino M, Keller R. Qualitative Differences in Attribution of Mental States to Other People in Autism and Schizophrenia: What are the Tools for Differential Diagnosis?. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52:1283-1298. doi:
  13. Pino M, Vagnetti R, Masedu F. Mapping the Network of Social Cognition Domains in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Through Graph Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11. doi:
  14. Pino M, Masedu F, Vagnetti R. Validity of Social Cognition Measures in the Clinical Services for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Psychol. 2020;11. doi:
  15. Demetriou E, DeMayo M, Guastella A. Executive Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder: History, Theoretical Models, Empirical Findings, and Potential as an Endophenotype. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10. doi:
  16. Di Sarro R, Di Santantonio A, Desideri L, Varrucciu N. Profiling planning skills and cognitive flexibility of adults with autism spectrum disorders: Preliminary results from an exploratory service-based study. Int J Dev Disabil. 2021;68:651-657. doi:
  17. Fabio R, Esposito S, Carrozza C. Correlations between facial emotion recognition and cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorder. Adv Autism. 2020;6:95-204. doi:
  18. Happé F, Frith U. The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36:5-25. doi:
  19. Hill E. Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism. Dev.Rev. 2004;24:189-233. doi:
  20. Olde Dubbelink L, Geurts H. Planning Skills in Autism Spectrum Disorder Across the Lifespan: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:1148-1165. doi:
  21. Ozonoff S, South M, Provencal S. New Developments in Autism: The Future Is Today. (Pérez J, González P, Llorente Comí M, Nieto C, eds.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007.
  22. Hughes C, Russell J. Autistic children’s difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implications for theories of autism. Dev Psychol. 1993;29.
  23. Joseph R, Tager-Flusberg H. The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism. Dev Psychopathol. 2004;16:137-155. doi:
  24. Ozonoff S. Autism As an Executive Disorder. (Russell J, ed.). Oxford University Press; 1997.
  25. Russell J, Jarrold C, Henry L. Working memory in children with autism and with moderate learning difficulties. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996;37:673-686. doi:
  26. Russell J. How Executive Disorders Can Bring about an Adequate Theory of mind”, in Russell J Eds, Autism As an Executive Disorder. Oxford University Press; 1997.
  27. Carroll D, Apperly I, Riggs K. Choosing between two objects reduces 3-year-olds’ errors on a reverse-contingency test of executive function. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007;98:184-192. doi:
  28. Bernier A, Carlson S, Whipple N. From external regulation to self-regulation: early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Dev. 2010;81:326-339. doi:
  29. Carruthers P. Theories of Theories of Mind. (Carruthers P, Smith P, eds.). Cambridge University Press; 1996.
  30. Kloo D, Perner J. Training transfer between card sorting and false belief understanding: helping children apply conflicting descriptions. Child Dev. 2003;74:1823-1839. doi:
  31. Moriguchi Y, Lee K, Itakura S. Social transmission of disinhibition in young children. Dev Sci. 2007;10:481-491. doi:
  32. Moriguchi Y. The early development of executive function and its relation to social interaction: a brief review. Front Psychol. 2014;5. doi:
  33. Perner J. Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. (Carruthers P, Boucher J, eds.). Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  34. Perner J, Lang B. Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. (Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen D, eds.). Oxford University Press; 2000.
  35. McAlister A, Peterson C. Siblings, theory of mind, and executive functioning in children aged 3-6 years: new longitudinal evidence. Child Dev. 2013;84:1442-1458. doi:
  36. Müller U, Liebermann-Finestone D, Carpendale J. Knowing minds, controlling actions: the developmental relations between theory of mind and executive function from 2 to 4 years of age. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012;111:331-348. doi:
  37. Wade M, Jenkins J. Pregnancy hypertension and the risk for neuropsychological difficulties across early development: A brief report. Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22:247-254. doi:
  38. Wade M, Prime H, Jenkins J. On the relation between theory of mind and executive functioning: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018;25:2119-2140. doi:
  39. Cissne M, Kester L, Gunn A. Brief Report: A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between Repetitive Behaviors and Concurrent Executive Function Demands in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52:1896-1902. doi:
  40. Mosconi M, Kay M, D’Cruz A. Impaired inhibitory control is associated with higher-order repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2009;39:1559-1566. doi:
  41. Ridley R. The psychology of perserverative and stereotyped behaviour. Prog Neurobiol. 1994;44:221-231. doi:
  42. Turner M. Generating novel ideas: fluency performance in high-functioning and learning disabled individuals with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40:189-201.
  43. Iversen R, Lewis C. Executive Function Skills Are Linked to Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors: Three Correlational Meta Analyses. Autism Res. 2021;14:1163-1185. doi:
  44. Liss M, Harel B, Fein D. Predictors and correlates of adaptive functioning in children with developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:219-230. doi:
  45. South M, Ozonoff S, McMahon W. The relationship between executive functioning, central coherence, and repetitive behaviors in the high-functioning autism spectrum. Autism. 2007;11:437-451. doi:
  46. Supekar K, Ryali S, Mistry P, Menon V. Aberrant dynamics of cognitive control and motor circuits predict distinct restricted and repetitive behaviors in children with autism. Nat Commun. 2021;12. doi:
  47. Cañas J, Fajardo I, Salmeron L. Cognitive flexibility. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. 2006;1:297-301.
  48. Carrozza C, Fabio R. Dysfunctional perceptual antecedent can justify the social orienting deficit in autism spectrum disorder: an eye-tracking study. Adv Autism. 2020;6:289-302. doi:
  49. Turner M. Autism As an Executive Disorder. (J. Russell J, ed.). Oxford University Press; 1997.
  50. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore P. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, (ADOS-2) Modules 1-4. Western Psychological Services; 2012.
  51. Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24:659-685. doi:
  52. Rutter M, Le Couteur A, Lord C. Autism diagnostic interview-revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2003;392:508-520. doi:
  53. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organization. Published online 1992.
  54. Le Donne I, Attanasio M, Bologna A. Autism and Intention Attribution Test: A Non-Verbal Evaluation With Comic Strips (In press).
  55. Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982;298:199-209. doi:
  56. Owen A. Cognitive planning in humans: neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;53:431-450. doi:
  57. Bosco F, Gabbatore I, Tirassa M. A broad assessment of theory of mind in adolescence: the complexity of mindreading. Conscious Cogn. 2014;24:84-97. doi:
  58. Bosco F, Gabbatore I, Tirassa M, Testa S. Psychometric Properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale in a Sample of Adolescents and Adults. Front Psychol. 2016;7. doi:
  59. Brizio A, Gabbatore I, Tirassa M, Bosco F. “No more a child, not yet an adult”: studying social cognition in adolescence. Front Psychol. 2015;6. doi:
  60. Choudhury S, Blakemore S, Charman T. Social cognitive development during adolescence. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006;1:165-174. doi:
  61. Dumontheil I, Apperly I, Blakemore S. Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Dev Sci. 2010;13:331-338. doi:
  62. Hatcher R, Hatcher S, Berlin M, Okla K, Richards J. Psychological mindedness and abstract reasoning in late childhood and adolescence: An exploration using new instruments. J Youth Adolesc. 1990;19:307-326. doi:
  63. Maylor E, Moulson J, Muncer A, Taylor L. Does performance on theory of mind tasks decline in old age?. Br J Psychol. 2002;93:465-485. doi:
  64. Happé F, Winner E, Brownell H. The getting of wisdom: theory of mind in old age. Dev Psychol. 1998;34:358-362. doi:
  65. Albert D, Steinberg L. Age differences in strategic planning as indexed by the tower of London. Child Dev. 2011;82:1501-1517. doi:
  66. Hughes C, Russell J, Robbins T. Evidence for executive dysfunction in autism. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32:477-492. doi:
  67. Fusar-Poli L, Brondino N, Rocchetti M. Diagnosing ASD in Adults Without ID: Accuracy of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:3370-3379. doi:
  68. Esbensen A, Seltzer M, Lam K, Bodfish J. Age-related differences in restricted repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:57-66. doi:
  69. Fecteau S, Mottron L, Berthiaume C, Burack J. Developmental changes of autistic symptoms. Autism. 2003;7:255-268. doi:
  70. Mawhood L, Howlin P, Rutter M. Autism and developmental receptive language disorder--a comparative follow-up in early adult life. I: Cognitive and language outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000;41:547-559. doi:
  71. Seltzer M, Krauss M, Shattuck P. The symptoms of autism spectrum disorders in adolescence and adulthood. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003;33:565-581. doi:
  72. Shattuck P, Seltzer M, Greenberg J. Change in autism symptoms and maladaptive behaviors in adolescents and adults with an autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007;37:1735-1747. doi:
  73. Kenny D, Korchmaros J, Bolger N. Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:115-128. doi:
  74. Preacher K, Hayes A. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:879-891. doi:
  75. Hayes A, Preacher K. Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear. Multivariate Behav Res. 2010;45:627-660. doi:
  76. Sobel M. Sociological Methodology. (Leinhardt S, ed.). Jossey-Boss; 1982.
  77. Sobel M. Sociological Methodology. (Tuma N, ed.). American Sociological; 1986.
  78. Lang B, Perner J. Understanding of intention and false belief and the development of self-control. Br J Dev Psychol. 2002;20:67-76.
  79. Perner J, Lang B. Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:337-344. doi:
  80. Perner J, Stummer S, Lang B. Developing Theories of Intention: Social Understanding and Self-Control. (Zelazo P, Astington J, Olson D, eds.). Erlbaum; 1999.
  81. Lai C, Lau Z, Lui S. Meta-analysis of neuropsychological measures of executive functioning in children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2017;10:911-939. doi:
  82. Pino M, Mazza M, Mariano M. Simple Mindreading Abilities Predict Complex Theory of Mind: Developmental Delay in Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:2743-2756. doi:
  83. Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 2002;8:71-82. doi:
  84. Leekam S, Prior M, Uljarevic M. Restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders: a review of research in the last decade. Psychol Bull. 2011;137:562-593. doi:
  85. Matson J, Dempsey T, Fodstad J. Stereotypies and repetitive/restrictive behaviours in infants with autism and pervasive developmental disorder. Dev Neurorehabil. 2009;12:122-127. doi:
  86. Wolff J, Botteron K, Dager S. Longitudinal patterns of repetitive behavior in toddlers with autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55:945-953. doi:
  87. Mazza M, Pino M, Vagnetti R. Intensive intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: comparison of three rehabilitation treatments. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021;25:28-36. doi:
  88. Lindsay S. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1340-1350. doi:
  89. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-168. doi:



Monica Mazza - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Margherita Attanasio - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Antony Bologna - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Ilenia Le Donne - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Marco Valenti - Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy; Reference Regional Centre for Autism, Abruzzo Region, Local Health Unit ASL 1, Italy

How to Cite
Mazza, M., Attanasio, M., Bologna, A., Le Donne, I. and Valenti, M. 2023. The relationship between theory of mind, executive functioning, and repetitive behavior in high functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Psychopathology. 29, 1/2 (Jul. 2023). DOI:
  • Abstract viewed - 725 times
  • PDF downloaded - 229 times